
Tim Murray has his say on One Blue North- One Blue South
VOTE AT BOTTOM OF THE PAGE
January 10, 2006
After hearing nothing but complaints about the situation in the First Division
Blue (north and south) I thought I would commit my thoughts to writing in
the hope of encouraging some feedback and hopefully some sensible discussion
to encourage the decision makers at BowlsWA to re-visit this situation.
It is becoming very clear that the original decision to "regionalise" first
division is flawed. Very flawed.
In a purely business sense BowlsWA has a responsibility to ensure their customers
are happy with their product. Whilst sponsors and partners are very important
in the promotion of the game, I submit that BowlsWA most important customers
are the players. Without the players we have no game. We have not yet reached
the half way point of the season and the players in the first blue division
system are already complaining openly that their clubs season is over due to
the meaningless of the finals series in this colour. Unlike the other first
divisions where finals are meaningful and played with great passion the reality
is that in first division blue it makes no difference to finish either second
or eighth at the end of the home and away season.
One club (not Sorrento) has advised me that if they do not finish on top but
do make the four that they will as a matter of protest not send a side to the
finals. For all the decision makers whom may read this article I urge you not
to think immediately about the punitive action you would take against such
a move but consider how strongly that club (your customer) must feel to take
such a drastic step.
I am advised that one of the key reasons to "regionalise" first division
was to keep travel to a minimum. I sincerely hope and trust that this had no
bearing on the decision. Our country brothers would laugh at us because we
are not prepared to travel for forty minutes to play. That would be a drive
around the block for them. They drive for several hours (one way) just to participate.
I thought the real reason was to alleviate the practice of four teams dropping
out of one gold every year. I strongly agreed with changing the one gold system
because it was just too brutal. However, I would have thought a much better
strategic move would have been to reduce the number of teams demoted from one
gold to the standard two and have the four second division winners play off
in a round robin with the top two going into gold.
This would not have caused the problems it has to the first division blue and
former gold competition. Another aspect is the impact on first division white.
A club having just two poor years could go from one white to second division.
Another scenario is what happens if the two clubs demoted from one white are
genuinely both north or south clubs. One team will have to be disadvantaged
by playing in the other region and for what valid reason? It could even happen
this year that Innaloo and Morley fall out. Where will one of those teams be
sent to next year.
My suggested solution is that for this season the side finishing on top in
both regions is promoted to one white. The sides that finish second to fifth
in both regions along with the two relegated one white sides make up one blue.
Sides finishing sixth to eighth from both regions with the four promoted second
division sides make up one gold. The last two sides in each region are demoted
to second division.
Under my proposal, next year we have only two demotions and two promotions
in all first divisions and that the four second divisions play off to earn
the right to one gold.
This will return the interest back to the competition as teams know they will
not finish on top but can still make the final four and have a shot from there.
In conclusion, can I say with the greatest of respect to the administrators
at BowlsWA you have not created any interest or promoted the game in one blue
north & south under these current arrangements. Please re-visit your original
decision. There is no sin in making mistakes there is only sin in not correcting
those mistakes if you have the power.
Tim Murray

Vote--Here